Rant - I want to get something off my chest: How brainwashed people can't tell the differences between political philosophy and spectrums in the fake divide of Political Centrism
The privatisation of the "Education Curriculum" made it happen with brainwashing Operation Mockingbird tools of MSM & "Alt" online that keeps the BS alive.
This is the real epidemic disease of poverty laced with corruption, and it needs to be eradicated once and for all.
It is beyond frustrating that dumbed down sheeple can’t tell the differences between political philosophy and political spectrums the way they can’t tell the differences between ethnicity and race through ignorance. “Liberal” or “Liberalism” as I have explained, is a political philosophy where “Third-way” Centrism is also intertwined in this philosophy, it has nothing to do with the “left” or “leftists”. The philosophy of liberalism means "open”, like George Soros, “Open Society”, which espouses so-called "freedom, democracy, and human rights,” but in reality its goal is to get individual sovereign countries “open for business,” promoting the need for globalisation and privatisation that serves the few of the ruling class. This is where economic ideology comes in, with the free markets of Austrian laissez-faire of the 19th century post-feudalism of the Gilded Age, which has been revived as Neoliberalism, as in Neoliberal globalisation after adopting Milton Friedman's Chicago Boys Manual of the Economic System groomed by the UK London School of Economics HQ as well as the less known fascist cold war hawks at CIA international right-wing Le Cercle elite cartel circles who are the fabrics of the Anglo big business elite central Chatham House HQ in the 1980s that runs Bilderberg and WEF (World Economic Forum) Davos, that binds the so-called political philosophy of “Liberalism” which is not even “open”, really closed and fascist in the name of so-called “democracy” in our fake democracies. Before his death in 2006, Friedman was an advisor to Republican President Ronald Reagan and Conservative British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
The same CIA that undermined left-wing parties across the globe, in the Global South and East beyond the Western European zone during the Cold War. How the CIA Waged a Cultural Cold War on Communism: American spies funded anti-Communists around the world. We can also talk about the interconnected, NATO-backed paramilitary Operation Gladio network established after WW2, reportedly inspired by fear of the USSR. It was also called the "Stay Behind Network.". Also, from the 1960s to the late 1980s, Operation Condor was a US-backed campaign of assassination and terrorisation carried out in South America.
How are liberalism and libertarianism related?
According to CIAWikipedia, the establishment themselves admitted that, "classical liberalism” is a political tradition and a branch of liberalism that advocates free market and laissez-faire economics. Despite the slight differences between various political authors and philosophers, this is where classical liberal thought has an influence on libertarianism.
Neoliberalism, the political arm of economic system ideology, and libertarianism, the political philosophy, share many common principles despite meaning different things to different people. Both trace their origins back to the classical liberal ideas of the Enlightenment and place significant importance on capitalism, free trade, private ownership, and limited government (small government). This is according to a pro-Libertarian website called learnliberty.org.
Libertarianism and the anarcho-libertarian branch are big ideological brands of the “alt” right and the fake “left” that are the anthesis of the left, the traditional left, that are linked to mainstream corporate centrism in today’s Cass Sunstein-shaped “alternative” media for the big business establishment. These establishment tools go back to the attempted Big Business plot of 1934 and the Powell Memo of 1971 during the post-1960s civil rights movements.
Robert Kennedy Jr and a free market manifesto for clean tech (Corporate “Climate Change” Alarmist Promoter) - Kennedy 2024, Democratic Party (Team B Single Business Party)
Centrist
According to the AllSides website,
For some, this word refers to more moderate, tempered and reasonable voices in America’s political conversation - especially those individuals attempting to take a position between the extremes.
For others, the word suggests a potentially worrisome imperative or pressure that individuals 'let go' of deeper convictions on either side of the political spectrum, in favor of adopting a watered-down, morally-compromised, middle-ground mono-narrative that serves to undergird existing powers.
There is overlap with ‘centrist’ and the word ‘moderate’ when the way forward on issues lies in compromise, but the overlap ends when moderates move to be more progressive or conservative in specific issues.
In other words, it practices “pragmatism,”, and it feeds on passiveness and pacifism in its philosophy, where it neutralises and destroys the resistance of historical economic system schisms of capitalism and today's unregulated “free” market fundamentalism of austerity from savage crony capitalist pushers.
How Did This Happen? A Documentary About Kensington, Philadelphia - YouTube
Since the political spectrum of corporate centrism became mainstreamed into the 1980s and 1990s by the single Big Business Party consensus of Neoconservatives that backs the economic system and ideology of unregulated “free” market fundamentalism. The “left” does not exist anymore in the US and other westernised countries, the fake political divide is nothing more than different coloured flavours between red and blue in the US and blue and red with yellow on the side alongside fake choices on the side in the UK. This is the sole reason why I don’t vote anymore in my country, the UK, because they have a political and economic consensus that backs the rotten economic system that has destroyed our concept of democracy because we simply live in fake democracies. I just don’t vote in a system of corporate political brands. There is no difference between Canada and other westernised countries either:
Centrist Party factions that destroyed the original party of Democrats and Labour that used to stand for the people, by the people:
These “Third Way” centrists became mainstream as the norm under the Single Business Party in the fake divide of political centrism. With enlightenment, charismatic personality attached to today’s “woke” intersectional imperialism of identity politics overrides policy to promote a façade of “progressive”, fake “left” cover PR image on historical imperial countries like the core western Anglosphere English-speaking nations of the United Kingdom and United States.
The yellow flag of "neither left nor right," corporate centrist, fascism as CIAWikipedia spells it out here. Yellow is the colour most strongly associated with liberalism and right-libertarianism.
That’s the reality:
Where Operation Mockingbird's mainstream establishment that echoes in Cass Sunstein’s “Alt” New Mockingbird media uses phrases like these:
‘The left/right divide is outdated and unhelpful’ - The New Statesmen, pro-Establishment Centrist MSM rag
‘Lines in the sand don't make for good policy-making, says Matilda Murday of the Democratic Society.’
Denying the existence of political spectrums that do exist between the left and the right, the coloured Pepsi-Coke flavours between blue and red or red and blue of our western Single Business Party free market consensus of corporate centrism are the real fake divide.
‘The Left-Right Political Spectrum Is Bogus’ - The Atlantic, pro-Establishment Centrist MSM rag
Promoting identity politics and undermining class as the issue…
The Left/Right Divide is Obsolete - Brownstone Institute, a establishment Libertarian centric Think Tank in Washington DC promotes Centrism
As we enter a new era of cultural conflict, old political boundaries no longer serve us.
Promoting culture wars……
Here’s the deal: There is something I want to sell you about this reality. The establishment isn't afraid of “left and right uniting”. It knows that a merger results in "corporate centrism," fascism, and the same "free" market (anarcho-libertarian) cult Big Business loves. Fascism is right-wing, so the right is no threat to the establishment. Only a genuine left-wing movement poses a threat (H/T @AuntBee8, Barbara Hammer). It is as easy to understand as ABC 123, which is easier than the establishment rainbow alphabet soup gang's increasing alphabet of their corporate agendas.
New Democrats 1985 USA
New Labour 1994 UK
…Conservative & Liberal Parties are just tag Teams A & B for Big Business, as CIA Officer John (Jack) Stockwell described GOP & DNC counterparts in the 1980s. Illusion of choice in "selections." - (H/T Barbara Hammer, Aunt BB)
Why is it designed that way?
It is as simple as this. Since the 1980s, our western political regimes’ economic system has been "free" market fundamentalism, which is unregulated faux "free" markets of private oligopoly Big Business control with private debt from the unregulated private central banking printing press of nothing (worse than being “sandwiched” into engineered stagflation transitioning in the 70s) with the unregulated capital markets today. Our economic model is Malthusian with "climate change," which is population control. Our politics is fake "democracy" of hand-selected puppets by Big Business oligarchs for "stability", controlling the country of neutralisation from revolt and opposition or resistance to the system by preserving the status quo, which is fascism. Fascism is not just about “a movement that promotes the idea of a forcibly monolithic, regimented nation under the control of an autocratic rule”, which is watered down, whitewashed, but the real meaning of fascism goes beyond the merger of corporations and the state. Fascism is about big business taking over government and our public services, that serve public needs. It’s our corrupt and rotten institutionalised system in the corporate shields of the oligarchy's political return of investment funds with their NGOs and their think tanks in the political halls that functions by design.
Mixed economy in the US (1933-1980) and UK (1945-1979)
Keynes was not a socialist, he just wanted to make sure that the people had enough money to invest and help the economy along. - CIAWikipedia
Before the 1980s, post World War II, 1945-1979, the core western Anglosphere nations, such as Britain HQ, didn’t necessarily have “socialism” but in name with Socialist government from real Labour under Attlee, which was Social Democracy post 1940-1944 Big Tent wartime coalition government under Churchill of last era of old imperial Britain, when we were introduced to Keynesian in 1945 under Capitalism, which is not “Socialist”, but a mix market economy (mixed economy) of regulated economy where we used to have a social market economy in Western Europe where we had strong public services, social welfare systems where FDR had elements but not at the same level, where there was compromise sacrificing universal healthcare with subsiding of companies that provide private healthcare insurance systems to pass the New Deal US regulated market system of the Big Tent coalition government, like China and Russia today with big tent coalition governments.
Obama's Big Sell out: The President has Packed His Economic Team with Wall Street Insiders
What people fail to see in the not-so-distant future of ours
With the Big Business coup of Davos we are still transitioning to, in this self demolishing of our westernised economies by ourselves not “China, not BRICS, not dedollarisation”, this Neoliberal globalisation economic system will update itself into a major update of Feudalism, with Neo-feudalism where industry will further institutionalise themselves into self regulations of privatised laws and eventual privatised constitution, post Neoliberalism of cheap debt based economy where you get a giant private fiefdom where the “state” no longer exist but a mere jurisdiction under Public Private Partnerships of “Stakeholder Capitalism” and corporations instead of sovereign countries are directly represented at the United Nations Security Council and UN absorbed, where they determine the future of humanity as a whole with the Military Industrial Complex under “rules based system” and not on original agreed treaty by sovereign countries. There are people like Scott, Barbara, and myself who know the inside from the outside, looking in with a bird’s-eye view.
If you're not on the streets protesting and setting up real peaceful protests by now, and if you’re not angry, then something is wrong with you.
Let’s go back to a time when there was:
1999 Seattle WTO protests
Gothenburg 2001 Riots
2002 World Bank Oslo protests
Recommended Reads:
Aitken dropped by the Right's secret club | The Independent | June 1997
EXCL Top Tories face questions over links to secretive foreign affairs group - PoliticsHome, July 2019
Related Articles
This article above explains why I don’t vote in "Elections” of selections. Local, regional, EU and general whatever.